Started 5 yr 6 mo ago
Took 2 min 26 sec
PR #98: Use interfaces instead of c...
No changes. | |
GitHub pull request #98 of commit 30f13332f031eb2aa4a2e813fb40eadc0497dbae, no merge conflicts. | |
Test Result (no failures) |
Module Builds
MicroProfile Reactive (didn’t run) | |
Eclipse MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators API (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators Core (didn’t run) | |
Eclipse MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators (didn’t run) | |
Eclipse MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators Specification (didn’t run) | |
Eclipse MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators TCK (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Messaging API (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Messaging (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Messaging Specification (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Messaging TCK (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams API (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators | 24 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators Core | 11 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators Specification | 18 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators SPI | 14 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators TCK | 31 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Operators TCK Arquillian | 5.8 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Support | 5.3 sec |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams Specification (didn’t run) | |
MicroProfile Reactive Streams TCK (didn’t run) |